[davydm]

Or, if you don't want to blow $500, set up your Gmail to do a similar thing. I've been set up like that for well over a decade. This service is likely more flexible, but also more risky - who do you think will stop working first? Google? Or one intrepid dev?

[randallme]

Fair point—Gmail's Inactive Account Manager exists and it's free. If that works for you, use it.

A few reasons someone might want something purpose-built:

1. Video/audio messages. I wanted to record something for people, not just send text.

2. Multiple recipients with different messages. Gmail sends one notification to designated contacts.

3. Attachments that outlive your Google account. When your account goes inactive, your Drive files go with it.

4. The "who survives longer" question is real. My answer: one-time payments (no churn pressure), minimal infrastructure that can run unattended for years, and I'm exploring escrow/trust structures for long-term continuity. Google's killed plenty of products too (RIP Inbox, Reader, etc).

But honestly, if Gmail works for your needs—use it. The goal is that the message gets delivered, not that I get your money.