top | item 47051011 (no title) estomagordo | 12 days ago Why is it wild that a LLM is as capable as a previously released LLM? discuss order hn newest crummy|12 days ago Opus is supposed to be the expensive-but-quality one, while Sonnet is the cheaper one.So if you don't want to pay the significant premium for Opus, it seems like you can just wait a few weeks till Sonnet catches up ceroxylon|12 days ago Strangely enough, my first test with Sonnet 4.6 via the API for a relatively simple request was more expensive ($0.11) than my average request to Opus 4.6 (~$0.07), because it used way more tokens than what I would consider necessary for the prompt. load replies (1) estomagordo|12 days ago Okay, thanks. Hard to keep all these names apart.I'm even surprised people pay more money for some models than others. tempestn|12 days ago Because Opus 4.5 was released like a month ago and state of the art, and now the significantly faster and cheaper version is already comparable. micw|12 days ago "Faster" is also a good point. I'm using different models via GitHub copilot and find the better, more accurate models way to slow. stavros|12 days ago Opus 4.5 was November, but your point stands. load replies (1) simianwords|12 days ago It means price has decreased by 3 times in a few months. Retr0id|12 days ago Because Opus 4.5 inference is/was more expensive.
crummy|12 days ago Opus is supposed to be the expensive-but-quality one, while Sonnet is the cheaper one.So if you don't want to pay the significant premium for Opus, it seems like you can just wait a few weeks till Sonnet catches up ceroxylon|12 days ago Strangely enough, my first test with Sonnet 4.6 via the API for a relatively simple request was more expensive ($0.11) than my average request to Opus 4.6 (~$0.07), because it used way more tokens than what I would consider necessary for the prompt. load replies (1) estomagordo|12 days ago Okay, thanks. Hard to keep all these names apart.I'm even surprised people pay more money for some models than others.
ceroxylon|12 days ago Strangely enough, my first test with Sonnet 4.6 via the API for a relatively simple request was more expensive ($0.11) than my average request to Opus 4.6 (~$0.07), because it used way more tokens than what I would consider necessary for the prompt. load replies (1)
estomagordo|12 days ago Okay, thanks. Hard to keep all these names apart.I'm even surprised people pay more money for some models than others.
tempestn|12 days ago Because Opus 4.5 was released like a month ago and state of the art, and now the significantly faster and cheaper version is already comparable. micw|12 days ago "Faster" is also a good point. I'm using different models via GitHub copilot and find the better, more accurate models way to slow. stavros|12 days ago Opus 4.5 was November, but your point stands. load replies (1)
micw|12 days ago "Faster" is also a good point. I'm using different models via GitHub copilot and find the better, more accurate models way to slow.
crummy|12 days ago
So if you don't want to pay the significant premium for Opus, it seems like you can just wait a few weeks till Sonnet catches up
ceroxylon|12 days ago
estomagordo|12 days ago
I'm even surprised people pay more money for some models than others.
tempestn|12 days ago
micw|12 days ago
stavros|12 days ago
simianwords|12 days ago
Retr0id|12 days ago