top | item 47054620

(no title)

seabrookmx | 12 days ago

My old job used Gerrit, and new job uses Gitlab. I really miss the information density and workflow of Gerrit. We enforce fast forward merges and squashing for MR's anyways, so we just have an awkward version of what Gerrit does by default.

Gitlab CI is good but we use local (k8s-hosted) runners so I have to imagine there's a bunch of options that provide a similar experience.

discuss

order

bjackman|11 days ago

You can't "stack" MRs in Gitlab though right? So if you're merging a complex feature you just have one huge mega commit?

techcode|11 days ago

What do you mean by "stack" MRs?

Just like with plain git - in GitLab you can merge a branch that has multiple separate commits in it. And you can also merge (e.g. topical/feature) branches into one branch - and then merge that "combined" branch into main/master.

Though most teams/project prefer you don't stretch that route to the extreme - simply because it's PITA to maintain/sync several branches for a long period of time, resolving merge conflicts between branches that have been separate for a long time isn't fun, and people don't like to review huge diffs.