[querez]

> The project owner strongly emphasize the no LLM dependency, in a world of AI slope this is so refreshing.

The project owner is talking about LLVM,a compiler toolkit, not an LLM.

[nurettin]

They also said "hand written", implying that no LLMs whirred, slopped and moonwalked all over the project.

[jorvi]

I mean.. I'm one of the staunchest skeptics of LLMs as agents, but they're amazing as supercharged autocomplete and I don't see anything wrong with them in that role. There's a position between handwritten and slopped that's pareto.

[kmaitreys]

It's actually quite easy to spot if LLMs were used or not.

Very few total number of commits, AI like documentation and code comments.

But even if LLMs were used, the overall project does feel steered by a human, given some decisions like not using bloated build systems. If this actually works then that's great.

[butvacuum]

Since when is squashing noisesum commits an AI activity instead of good manners?

[luckydata]

this type of project is the perfect project for an llm, llvm and cuda work as harnesses, easy to compare.

[natvert]

Says the clawdbot