(no title)
kalvin | 12 days ago
If you'd like to see an example of what Watsi's about, check out Philip's profile: https://watsi.org/profile/2286cb03a5bd-philip
Also, fun fact: 619 of our current "Universal Fund" monthly donors first made a donation 10 or more years ago, and I'm pretty sure many of those were/are Hacker News readers.
If you're interested, see https://watsi.org/universal-fund
maerF0x0|12 days ago
Particularly for basic needs like housing,food,clothes... Like what if instead of giving a charity $100 we created 41c per month? of UBI (roughly the cashflow from investing that same $100). Yes it would seem too little today, but in time it would be massive because it would never dissipate.
IDK, just my musing while claude takes, err does, my job.
MagicMoonlight|12 days ago
There’s nothing people hate more than lasting charitable foundations. They take them to court so that they can crack them open and wank away the entire fund in 6 months.
There was one which was supposed to pay off the entire national debt. They cracked and spaffed it.
Another was supposed to end piracy. Cracked and spaffed.
You could save a million people a year, but that won’t save you from being cracked and spaffed. They’re already rubbing their trotters at the thought.
luplex|11 days ago
BobaFloutist|12 days ago
chaseadam17|12 days ago
rsynnott|11 days ago
One big issue is that it's a PR problem; most people don't really understand it. They'll look at the non-profit and say "why does that need to raise money, it's rich". You saw this a lot with Harvard in Trump's recent funding war with it, say.
doctoboggan|12 days ago
kalvin|12 days ago
Paw: https://watsi.org/profile/9dae70d8f758-paw