Wow it’s even worse than I thought. I thought that convictungly morhing would be the only problem. The nonsense and inconsistent arrowheads, the missing annotations, the missing bubbles. The “tirm” axis…
That this was ever published shows a supreme lack of care.
This passage from the post by the original creator of the diagramme summarises our Bruh New World:
"What's dispiriting is the (lack of) process and care: take someone's carefully crafted work, run it through a machine to wash off the fingerprints, and ship it as your own. This isn't a case of being inspired by something and building on it. It's the opposite of that. It's taking something that worked and making it worse. Is there even a goal here beyond "generating content"?
It looks like typical "memorization" in image generation models. The author likely just prompted the image.
The model makers attempt to add guardrails to prevent this but it's not perfect. It seems a lot of large AI models basically just copy the training data and add slight modifications
> It seems a lot of large AI models basically just copy the training data and add slight modifications
Copyright laundering is the fundamental purpose of LLMs, yes. It's why all the big companies are pushing it so much: they can finally freely ignore copyright law by laundering it through an AI.
> It seems a lot of large AI models basically just copy the training data and add slight modifications
This happens even to human artists who aren't trying to plagiarize - for example, guitarists often come up with a riff that turns out to be very close to one they heard years ago, even if it feels original to them in the moment.
yoz-y|12 days ago
That this was ever published shows a supreme lack of care.
quietbritishjim|12 days ago
shaky-carrousel|12 days ago
duxup|12 days ago
zephen|12 days ago
heresie-dabord|12 days ago
"What's dispiriting is the (lack of) process and care: take someone's carefully crafted work, run it through a machine to wash off the fingerprints, and ship it as your own. This isn't a case of being inspired by something and building on it. It's the opposite of that. It's taking something that worked and making it worse. Is there even a goal here beyond "generating content"?
fooyc|12 days ago
spydr|11 days ago
https://techhub.saworks.io/docs/intermediate-github-tutorial...
rzmmm|12 days ago
The model makers attempt to add guardrails to prevent this but it's not perfect. It seems a lot of large AI models basically just copy the training data and add slight modifications
pjc50|12 days ago
coldpie|12 days ago
Copyright laundering is the fundamental purpose of LLMs, yes. It's why all the big companies are pushing it so much: they can finally freely ignore copyright law by laundering it through an AI.
jimmaswell|12 days ago
This happens even to human artists who aren't trying to plagiarize - for example, guitarists often come up with a riff that turns out to be very close to one they heard years ago, even if it feels original to them in the moment.
franktankbank|12 days ago