It appears the deal was based exclusively on greed to begin with which would be bad enough, but escalating greed was baked in to "compensate" for what was given up during agreement, which could not be anything other than adversarial rather than co-operative.
Simply because the element of greed not only existed, but was dominant by a large margin. If not a multiple.
fuzzfactor|12 days ago
Simply because the element of greed not only existed, but was dominant by a large margin. If not a multiple.