Even if it does, there will probably be a prolonged economic period where robots are doing dangerous/messy stuff like welding, plumbing but there is a human master guiding them from a few yards away, via prompts, controllers, etc. More of a semi-autonomous power tool than an fully autonomous master that is delivered by drone on-demand. Scalability is still a ways off.
If we get AGI and fully autonomous robot assistants, we'll live in a post scarcity world like Star Trek, or somebody in control the robots will use them to enslave all of humanity... so... high variance outcome could go either way.
IMO literally automating the job isn't the only possible scenario -- already in the weightlifting space coaches are supplying skills and system prompts to llms that do their training for them, massively raising the number of students they can train at at time -- at some point that turns training into a zero sum game
Absolutely. Design parametric families of patterns, 3d-scan the person, let customer adjust with live preview, laser cut, then fully automated or low-skill assembly. Probably not currently economical like many things involving physical world manipulation, but without obvious roadblocks.
pphysch|11 days ago
scoofy|11 days ago
insane_dreamer|10 days ago
UltraSane|11 days ago
layer8|11 days ago
femiagbabiaka|11 days ago
Uber didn't need to launch in every neighborhood to start destroying the taxi business
Facebook didn't need to have every eyeball on the internet in order to massively disrupt trad advertising
At some point there's just a tipping point
lukan|11 days ago
jimbokun|11 days ago
kardashev8|11 days ago
handzhiev|11 days ago
femiagbabiaka|11 days ago
AntiDyatlov|11 days ago
pier25|11 days ago
Epa095|11 days ago
ansgri|11 days ago
insane_dreamer|10 days ago
and in a world where many/most(?) people have lost their jobs to AI, only the wealthy few will be able to afford tailoring anyway