(no title)
kmoser | 10 days ago
And this isn't even counting sets that include multiples of the same item; once you get into that territory, there really is no upper bound.
kmoser | 10 days ago
And this isn't even counting sets that include multiples of the same item; once you get into that territory, there really is no upper bound.
zdragnar|10 days ago
Given that constant change to the available combinations of sets, it would seem that a truly capable system would need to be practically infinite, no?
Dylan16807|10 days ago
Definitely no multiples. What would that even mean, also you would need unbounded space for multiples of just two atoms.
kmoser|10 days ago
I have a list and I want to assign a unique ID to each list item. Each list item itself contains one or more items:
List item 2 contains two references to my umbrella [ID "a"].