top | item 47072141

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office

70 points| asdefghyk | 11 days ago |bbc.com

49 comments

order

spacebanana7|11 days ago

The last time the Duke of York was arrested was in 1483. And before that, the most recent prior was in 1452 during the War of the Roses.

drcongo|11 days ago

Blimey, he's older than he looks.

jaxelr|10 days ago

I wonder, does the streak technically still continues? As he was stripped of his titles.

petepete|11 days ago

Series 7 of The Crown will be fun.

adaml_623|11 days ago

As always when reading about these stories I have two questions:

* When did other high profile people know about this illegal and immoral behavior

* Who else is getting away with similar behavior right now

bell-cot|11 days ago

1 - Assume it was decades ago. That I've heard, a fair number of the released emails mentioned Jeff's 2008 conviction. But to paraphrase Leona Helmsley, "only the little people need to follow laws". That attitude seems to be very common in the emails.

2 - Isn't it convenient that zero major news organizations - controlled by high profile people and their buddies - are raising that issue? Not that I believe there to be any public support for competent & systematic enforcement of the laws against such behavior. That I've heard of, nobody even cares about how Jeff got off with a slap on the wrist in 2008.

BLKNSLVR|11 days ago

I also kinda have the question of: Who is the new Jeffrey Epstein?

Nature abhors a vacuum, and it seems the space that Epstein filled was large and branching and significantly profitable (in money, information, and influence). There's no way there isn't at least one other person that's started to fill the void.

Ideally, the ramifications of association with Epstein should shrink the size of the vacuum considerably, but the pursuit of those associates has really only just started and, as someone else has already pointed out, some countries / governments are protecting these associates rather than investigating / prosecuting. As such, there's not much discouragement yet.

throwaway85825|10 days ago

The royal family really doesn't want to answer questions about what they knew and when about the trafficking. So instead they'll just get rid of him with a lesser less implicating charge.

foldr|10 days ago

I think this is a misreading of the situation. He’s being arrested because of recently uncovered evidence that he committed a crime. We can all form our own opinions on whether or not Andrew committed rape and/or sexual abuse (without too much difficulty, I assume), but this crime looks like it ought to be a lot easier to prosecute.

gib444|10 days ago

The crime he was arrested for carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment, but I doubt anyone has ever been given that sentence. It's fodder for the masses to think it's a serious crime

bell-cot|11 days ago

It would be lovely if the Brits could truly clean house on this issue.

(Sadly, expecting the Yanks to follow their lead on that would be pure fantasy.)

beardyw|10 days ago

He was in Greggs at the time.

rich_sasha|10 days ago

It is unreal to me that all the criminal prosecution is only happening to Brits. Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, likely Peter Mandelson.

In the US..? Epstein tragically was committed suicide, and no other cases are forthcoming.

asdefghyk|10 days ago

Why has Andrew not been extradited to USA.?

Any commoner would have been sent "quick smart" to face the accusations there in court?

asdefghyk|10 days ago

Ghislaine Maxwell, has said she had never saw Epstein do anything untoward.... She now says, she’ll tell everything?? in exchange for immunity.

FrankWilhoit|11 days ago

This is how it is done! But it could only have been done with the King's permission. I wonder how he will spin it.

rsynnott|11 days ago

The thing about a lot of monarchical powers in the UK is that the monarch gets to keep them, provided of course that they only ever use them as prescribed by the government. As to what happens otherwise, well, Charles III won't want to emulate Charles I.

(I'm kind of amazed he chose that name, tbh; it's not particularly uncommon for British monarchs to rename themselves on taking the throne, and it has... baggage.)

markx2|10 days ago

Official statements have been released that clearly state the King was not informed prior to the arrest.

asdefghyk|11 days ago

I think there is a lot more of this story to play out ...

Still seems to be lots more to play out.

Example - Why all the supposed "...rich and powerful names ...." being seemingly protected ?

What do they have to hide ?

foldr|10 days ago

The Police don’t need the King’s permission to arrest members of the royal family.

benbojangles|11 days ago

And this is of course tech related because??? If I wanted news I would just check my RSS feed.

asdefghyk|10 days ago

I'd suggest, their is intellectual curiosity about how the rich and powerful seem to be treated differently.

Consider , others accused of such crimes, would be very quickly to court to face accusers before a judge, but in the this case it has not happened? Why?

Seems to be some unspoken protection between others?

rkachowski|11 days ago

They're purposefully being vague, but this is Prince Andrew finally facing consequences in the face of the Epstein files (?)

OJFord|11 days ago

How is it vague? If you mean by not saying 'Prince Andrew', that's because he's already been stripped of that title.

brazzy|11 days ago

Former prince. And t's not purposefully vague, the article explicitly says "It comes after Thames Valley Police said they were assessing a complaint over the alleged sharing of confidential material by the former prince with late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein"

beAbU|10 days ago

He's being prosecuted for sharing sensitive information with 3rd parties or something. He was in some cushy foreign envoy type job back then, and it seems he did not really take it very seriously. In the epstein files there is evidence that he regularly shared sensitive information with JE and others.

He's not being prosecuted for raping kids. But maybe new evidence comes to light during this investigation.

Grum9|11 days ago

[deleted]

sohrob|11 days ago

Meanwhile in the States, their government is doxxing the victims and masking the identities of the perpetrators.

adaml_623|11 days ago

The abuse perpetratored by Epstein is obviously hideous but is there an argument that his corporate and government espionage activities need to be looked at as a clear organized criminal conspiracy?

iso1631|11 days ago

They got Al Capone on tax fraud

asdefghyk|11 days ago

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office