top | item 47072379 (no title) happymellon | 11 days ago Yeah, sorry, typo.Still they institutionalise getters, which is the opposite of what their argument was. discuss order hn newest tadfisher|11 days ago Well, they don't have "getters" either, they have accessors; x() instead of getX(). It's still bad, but at least it doesn't enforce JavaBeans conventions, which is where getters and setters actually originate [0].0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JavaBeans
tadfisher|11 days ago Well, they don't have "getters" either, they have accessors; x() instead of getX(). It's still bad, but at least it doesn't enforce JavaBeans conventions, which is where getters and setters actually originate [0].0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JavaBeans
tadfisher|11 days ago
0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JavaBeans