[pitched]

I also have to eat and put a roof over my head. Tying that to a system that can change permanently at any time to something less helpful is dangerous.

Preferring open source is a risk mitigation strategy. The closed alternative may have better features to make them worth that risk though.

[philipallstar]

One feature is: it's a business and won't be abandoned due to OSS but out if it has a sustainable way to continue.

[ZoomZoomZoom]

Healthy and not extremely niche Free Software projects don't disappear. My software stack I rely on daily mostly barely changed in 15 and more years.

The amount of businesses closed, sold and products abandoned or swapped for the more controlled/exploitable ones is numerous, on the other hand.

[johntash]

The (almost) opposite is also a feature: it's OSS and will still be available if the business goes out of business