(no title)
hamdingers | 10 days ago
Long term it will affect us all, likely more than the cuts the news prefers to focus on (tragic though they may be).
hamdingers | 10 days ago
Long term it will affect us all, likely more than the cuts the news prefers to focus on (tragic though they may be).
bluescrn|10 days ago
Can't it simply be a case of aggressive and overoptimistic attempts to cut spending (especially spending viewed as ideological) doing far more harm than good?
unclad5968|10 days ago
I won't pretend to know what the actual motives were, but financial "efficiency" seems suspect to me.
Supermancho|10 days ago
I think this is obvious. It was one of many goals, that aligned under an umbrella of activities. Asking for specific data creates a paper trail and triggers regulation. Restricting access, taking outright possession of hardware, and firing people along the way, helps shield the activity.
> Can't it simply be a case of aggressive and overoptimistic attempts to cut spending
aka "Aww shucks, we were just doin our best."
No rational organization would take many of the actions that were taken, if one of their primary goals was accountability. It was a smash and grab (disorganized would be fair to say), with an ad-hoc rationalization that was never reasoned.
PopAlongKid|10 days ago
To hide the true purpose behind a curtain of "aggressive and overoptimistic attempts to cut spending".
unknown|10 days ago
[deleted]
krapp|10 days ago
Maybe they were naive and useful idiots, but that doesn't just happen by accident.
mvdtnz|10 days ago