top | item 47075365

(no title)

youknownothing | 10 days ago

Putting everything that DOGE has done, am I the only one who thinks that there is a teeny, tiny conflict of interest in Musk naming a department pretty much the same as one of the cryptocurrencies that he supports (Dogecoin)? Isn't that using the government for marketing?

discuss

order

krapp|10 days ago

Yes, when you set aside Musk buying Twitter and using it to platform white supremacists and extremists to help get Trump elected in exchange for benefits to his companies and direct control over private regulatory and financial data that allowed him to gain potential advantage over his competition and punish his enemies, naming your fake government office after your memecoin is also a problem.

People probably don't focus on that because it's the least worst aspect of any of this. Also the President of the United States rugpulled the public on two memecoins and wiped out $4 billion, and no one talks about that either.

mrguyorama|10 days ago

Trump sold beans in the oval office.

intermerda|10 days ago

If the list of crimes and improprieties of this administration were ranked by their severity, this one will surely get a 5-digit rank.

dang|8 days ago

We banned this account, not because of what it posted here but because of personal attacks in other threads. Please see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47106839.

(I'm replying here as well because the other comment was already a week old.)

mlnj|10 days ago

And THAT is the biggest issue you have with the whole ordeal?