(no title)
derbOac | 10 days ago
My guess is you couldn't get a roomful of experts to agree on what "DEI" means; I doubt AI could do better, and even if it could, I'm not sure I'd want that to be the determining factor about whether it would get funded. To the extent it was, I'm not sure it would be a bad thing.
yks|10 days ago
let's not pretend that anyone involved cares one bit
amelius|10 days ago
Another layer?
I think it's the same level of stupidity/shadiness.
RangerScience|10 days ago
So that seems like a pretty good actual "what's DEI?" - Does race/gender/sexuality/etc affect some outcome? Should it? If it does affect it and shouldn't, what we can we do about it?
That said... yeah, not gonna get a room full of anyone to agree on that. Starting with that "should".
krapp|10 days ago
You don't need to, it's clearly defined within existing legal frameworks.
A lot of people including the current administration seem to believe it means "racism against white men," but those people are simply wrong.
tastyface|10 days ago
[deleted]
EdiX|10 days ago
I really hope the backlash to this bullshit finally reaches europe.
Same song and dance for 14 years straight, there is no SJW you're just imagining them, it's just called being a decent human being, they say as they kick me repeatedly in the face.
[1] https://archive.is/UmkH3