[7bit]

You think the bigger issue is the thing she does voluntary, and that the lesser issue is that Grok leaked something without her consent, that she protected for over a decade?

Are you serious?

[randyrand]

From a privacy perspective, doing something voluntarily doesn't negate anything. It's still the bigger privacy issue.

[randyrand]

All it takes is for one person to recognize her for her name to be known.

[chrisjj]

You have some reason to think she didn't reveal her legal name voluntarily?

And Grok didn't leak anything. Her legal name was already public for years.

[ShowalkKama]

how did grok gain access to this supposedly private information? Did it pilfer her private emails? Did it hack the producer's website and gained access to confidential files? Did it look through her computer?

Look, I hate grok just as much as the next person but if it was just crawled then by definition it is not private.

You may very well argue that people are harassing her (and that it's not ok), you may even argue that AI should not facilitate such harassment but to call publicly available information private is mental gymnastic.

[chrisjj]

> how did grok gain access to this supposedly private information? Did it pilfer her private emails? Did it hack the producer's website and gained access to confidential files? Did it look through her computer?

Or just read the Instagram and Facebook pages for this stage name. This "private" info is right there.