[zombot]

> I would rather a single human (for now) architect with good taste and an army of agents than a team of humans.

A human might have taste, but AI certainly doesn't.

[dsego]

It has average taste based on the code it was trained on. For example, every time I attempted to polish the UX it wanted to add a toast system, I abhor toasts as a UX pattern. But it also provided elegant backend designs I hadn't even considered.

[zombot]

> It has average taste based on the code it was trained on.

Agreed. Just that I view "average taste" as no taste at best.

[elevatortrim]

I’d say AI has better taste than an average human but definitely not the taste you would see in competent people around you.

[zombot]

> I’d say AI has better taste than an average human

This is wrong by definition because AI outputs the average of its training data.