(no title)
londons_explore | 10 days ago
Turns out that certain really helpful reddit posters respond in exactly the same way AI companies wish their models would respond, and the RLHF process really reinforces their mannerisms despite being 0.00001% of the total training data.
I feel sorry for them - their recent post history is full of mods banning them for being a bot.
westurner|9 days ago
My posts are link dense because citations are worth sharing.
It's really frustrating because they're half-assedly alleging in ignorance when I'm taking the time to do something more like actual research and sharing.
I don't want to assume it's an inadequacy or an inferiority self-soothing response.
Perhaps more troubling than AI replacing actual critical thought is "that's AI so it's bunk" replacing actual dissent and argumentation.
Someday I'll compare occasional archives of my outbound communications to see what's been flagged and censored for example "because that's AI".
8cvor6j844qw_d6|10 days ago