(no title)
jrjeksjd8d | 9 days ago
Tesla has had it both ways for ages - their stock price was based on "self-driving cars" and their liability was based on "asterisk asterisk the car cannot drive itself".
jrjeksjd8d | 9 days ago
Tesla has had it both ways for ages - their stock price was based on "self-driving cars" and their liability was based on "asterisk asterisk the car cannot drive itself".
nitinreddy88|9 days ago
tapoxi|9 days ago
tim-tday|9 days ago
seanmcdirmid|9 days ago
But then again even on HN people like parent think that autopilot is the same as full self driving, when it is and always has been just smarter cruise control. The payout was for autopilot (a feature that most new cars have these days under various names), not full self driving.
digitalPhonix|6 days ago
That is absolutely false.
A 20 year old avionics suite in General Aviation (GTN 450) does much more than maintain altitude, speed & heading - you input a flight plan including an approach, it will fly the flight plan, capture the approach signals (VOR/localiser/whatever - which is far more complex than “keeping course”) all the way down to approach minimums.
It can go down to 200ft for an LPV approach.
philistine|9 days ago
That is absolutely not true. A plane on autopilot can land itself except for applying the brakes.
nickff|9 days ago
Rudimentary 'autopilots' on aircraft have existed for about a century now, and the earlier versions (before transistorization) only controlled heading and attitude (if conditions and other settings allowed it), with little indication of failure.
D-Coder|9 days ago
The average person does know what an autopilot does, they're just wrong.
I think the example you provided supports that.
tass|9 days ago
unknown|9 days ago
[deleted]