[vaylian]

> Instead, I offered to sign a modified declaration confirming data deletion. I had no interest in retaining anyone’s personal data, but I was not going to agree to silence about the disclosure process itself.

Why sign anything at all? The company was obviously not interested in cooperation, but in domination.

[chuckadams]

Getting them to agree to your terms pretty much nullifies their domination strategy, and in fact becomes legally binding on them.

[vaylian]

It's clear that the intentions of the insurance company are selfish and they want to gain leverage over the reporter. Even if the reporter managed to add a clause about data deletion, the company could still make the reporter's life hell with the remaining clauses that were signed. This is not worth the risk.

[gchamonlive]

Because you are highjacking a thread. Wanna trash the site's design, you should open a top level thread instead.

[MBCook]

Your response didn’t have anything to do with the parent comment. And I’m on a phone (iOS) and had no issue reading it, for the record.