top | item 47093066

(no title)

vaylian | 9 days ago

> Instead, I offered to sign a modified declaration confirming data deletion. I had no interest in retaining anyone’s personal data, but I was not going to agree to silence about the disclosure process itself.

Why sign anything at all? The company was obviously not interested in cooperation, but in domination.

discuss

order

chuckadams|9 days ago

Getting them to agree to your terms pretty much nullifies their domination strategy, and in fact becomes legally binding on them.

vaylian|8 days ago

It's clear that the intentions of the insurance company are selfish and they want to gain leverage over the reporter. Even if the reporter managed to add a clause about data deletion, the company could still make the reporter's life hell with the remaining clauses that were signed. This is not worth the risk.

dwedge|9 days ago

[deleted]

gchamonlive|9 days ago

Because you are highjacking a thread. Wanna trash the site's design, you should open a top level thread instead.

MBCook|9 days ago

Your response didn’t have anything to do with the parent comment. And I’m on a phone (iOS) and had no issue reading it, for the record.