[Tharre]

> And that's objective.

I don't think you understand what that word means.

Regardless, your opinion (and mine) is irrelevant. People want at least some of the features of modern android, and any alternative lacking those is not going to be adopted by most people. Just look at how many people try GrapheneOS and find the minor things to be dealbreakers for them.

And as long as that's the case you can't expect people to vote for a scenario where they'll end up with a, in their eyes, worse product.

[iririririr]

Name one feature android have today that was missing from comunity rom built on top of android 2.3. only sandox kerbel featurea, but that's a circular argument.

Only things nobody wanted were missing then. Like fake AI photo enhancement.

[Tharre]

Fully hardware-based disk encryption with key management. Or live captions. Or a far better java runtime with superior memory management. Or a million other things.

But even your own example works, just because you dislike camera filters, doesn't mean everybody else agrees with that. There are probably more women with smartphones that use those, then there are that don't.