[nickff]

I've owned and used two of the affected models (for ~6 years in total), and also read the version of events presented by the plaintiffs (in their claims), as well as the judges' view of what happened.

I originally read the documents to understand whether the unit I own is safe, and believed in its safety strongly enough that I have continued to use it.

[judahmeek]

So you've never actually tried to bypass the safety mechanism to determine the difficulty of doing so?

Because I'd bet you that the jury certainly did.

[nickff]

I’d make that bet, because you obviously don’t know much about pressure cookers or the law. Juries hear expert testimony; they do not perform independent investigations. I have inadvertently tested the safety mechanisms, and they are quite secure. I will not do what plaintiffs say they did, because it is so incredibly stupid.