(no title)
beloch | 9 days ago
e.g. In a different path, 1 and 2 are the same, but things then diverge.
3) To recoup some of those tariff costs, the company sells the rights to any potential future tariff refunds. They recoup a portion of what they paid immediately but hand away the right to a full refund to another party, such as Cantor Fitzgerald. The seller might use this to reduce prices for their customers, but probably won't. They'll set prices according to what the market will support.
4) US government will refund all/most of that tax back to companies, like Cantor Fitzgerald, that bought the rights to tariff refunds.
5) Seller doesn't get any extra money back, so there's no money to refund to consumers.
IMPORTANT NOTE: Cantor Fitzgerald, while just one of the companies doing this, was formerly headed by Howard Lutnick and is currently owned and operated by his sons.
kjshsh123|7 days ago
The price the market supports depends on things like taxes and tariffs.
Why removing taxes lowers prices:
https://open.substack.com/pub/shonczinner/p/why-removing-tax...
madaxe_again|9 days ago
lesuorac|9 days ago
Afaik, Byzantine (or reverse) and other private tax collection setups aren't illegal.
LeifCarrotson|9 days ago
tedd4u|9 days ago
lostlogin|9 days ago
abakker|9 days ago
aaronrobinson|8 days ago
[deleted]
gcanyon|8 days ago
idiotsecant|8 days ago
JimmyBiscuit|8 days ago
Or is there another source for this claim?
unknown|8 days ago
[deleted]