(no title)
reverius42 | 10 days ago
> There's nothing wrong with small, short-lived branches that can be quickly reviewed and merged into main.
I would have called this "branch based development", personally.
reverius42 | 10 days ago
> There's nothing wrong with small, short-lived branches that can be quickly reviewed and merged into main.
I would have called this "branch based development", personally.
KronisLV|10 days ago
https://www.atlassian.com/git/tutorials/comparing-workflows/...
But yeah, that’s what people generally settled on, naming wise.