top | item 47100537 (no title) StilesCrisis | 9 days ago You didn't need ChatGPT to coauthor this article. Just use your own authentic voice. In 2026 no one likes GPT text anymore. discuss order hn newest al_borland|9 days ago I would go so far as to say no one has ever liked GPT text. walletdrainer|8 days ago [deleted] peddling-brink|9 days ago 1. I agree with you. The standard GPT voice is grating in its ability to use so many words without saying anything.2. I also see it as a modern tower of Babylon. A linguistic equalizer of sorts. daem|8 days ago Nearly everything I write on a computer these days is via voice to text AI and filtered through Claude.You’re right though, upon re-read there are some places in this article where my authentic voice doesn’t come through. Re-writing. the_biot|8 days ago You misunderstand. This is not a small adjustment you need to make. You didn't write it at all. load replies (1) iinnPP|9 days ago [deleted] leephillips|9 days ago That’s not what “prejudice” means. It would be prejudice if the commenter objected to LLMs despite the quality of their output. However, the objection is based on the results. Also, the comment is correct. walletdrainer|9 days ago [deleted]
al_borland|9 days ago I would go so far as to say no one has ever liked GPT text. walletdrainer|8 days ago [deleted]
peddling-brink|9 days ago 1. I agree with you. The standard GPT voice is grating in its ability to use so many words without saying anything.2. I also see it as a modern tower of Babylon. A linguistic equalizer of sorts.
daem|8 days ago Nearly everything I write on a computer these days is via voice to text AI and filtered through Claude.You’re right though, upon re-read there are some places in this article where my authentic voice doesn’t come through. Re-writing. the_biot|8 days ago You misunderstand. This is not a small adjustment you need to make. You didn't write it at all. load replies (1)
the_biot|8 days ago You misunderstand. This is not a small adjustment you need to make. You didn't write it at all. load replies (1)
iinnPP|9 days ago [deleted] leephillips|9 days ago That’s not what “prejudice” means. It would be prejudice if the commenter objected to LLMs despite the quality of their output. However, the objection is based on the results. Also, the comment is correct. walletdrainer|9 days ago [deleted]
leephillips|9 days ago That’s not what “prejudice” means. It would be prejudice if the commenter objected to LLMs despite the quality of their output. However, the objection is based on the results. Also, the comment is correct.
al_borland|9 days ago
walletdrainer|8 days ago
[deleted]
peddling-brink|9 days ago
2. I also see it as a modern tower of Babylon. A linguistic equalizer of sorts.
daem|8 days ago
You’re right though, upon re-read there are some places in this article where my authentic voice doesn’t come through. Re-writing.
the_biot|8 days ago
iinnPP|9 days ago
[deleted]
leephillips|9 days ago
walletdrainer|9 days ago
[deleted]