Nice work on the formal verification — 50K states with zero violations is solid.\n\nOne thing I've been thinking about in this space: authorization (what an agent CAN do) is only half the problem. The other half is identity (WHO is the agent). Your K-of-N threshold approach handles the authorization side well, but it assumes you already know which agents are part of the quorum.\n\nIn multi-agent systems where agents come from different frameworks or organizations, establishing identity first becomes critical. Who issued this agent? Can I verify it cryptographically? What's its track record?\n\nI've been working on this from the identity angle — Ed25519 DIDs, challenge-response verification, and a peer-to-peer vouching system for building trust graphs between agents. The two approaches feel very complementary: identity tells you who's asking, authorization (like IC-AGI) tells you what they're allowed to do.\n\nCurious: does your capability token model support any notion of agent reputation or trust scores, or is it purely policy-based?
No comments yet.