top | item 47104412

(no title)

Bnjoroge | 9 days ago

Most, if not the entire article reads to me as AI-generated which just makes me uninterested in reading further.

discuss

order

mat0|9 days ago

I read it for you. Spoiler alert, remained uninteresting until the end. I agree with the notion that we will have to adapt our workflows now that coding is getting cheaper (at least for now), but the author is suggesting to forgo PRs entirely and demonises humans for being slow and some sort of bottleneck. The author is suggesting that you can let agents go crazy on your codebase and that if you don't do it you are some sort of dinosaur that doesn't accept change. It's complete nonsense in my opinion.

jackphilson|9 days ago

What is your take on the optimal usage of AI, and why would it not be N + 1? I think the article is largely correct here.