top | item 47105852

(no title)

alexfromapex | 8 days ago

I don't know why anyone uses Electron anymore, Tauri produces much smaller binaries and is amazing.

discuss

order

torginus|8 days ago

I don't know why anyone uses Tauri - disk space is cheap but having to handle QA and supporting quirks for every possible browser engine the users' system could ship with certainly is not.

danpalmer|8 days ago

It's a RAM issue not a disk space issue. Binaries get loaded into memory.

Also if you haven't heard, disk space is no longer as cheap, and RAM is becoming astoundingly expensive.

gobdovan|8 days ago

Chrome DevTools Protocol, navigation stack control, download manager, permission mediation, certificate inspection, cache policy control, so nothing you can't implement in an afternoon

neodymiumphish|8 days ago

Agreed! I built a MacOS Postgres client with just Claude Code[1]. It could use some UI improvements, but it runs much better than other apps I’ve tried (specifically what it’s replacing for me: RazorSQL) and the binary is smaller than 20MB.

1: https://github.com/NeodymiumPhish/Pharos

lsaferite|8 days ago

Tauri is still a WebView wrapped in some chrome, right? That's not what I would consider "native".

Klonoar|8 days ago

For all the complaints about Electron, it's at least led to more widespread shipping of some applications on Linux.

Tauri's story with regards to the webview engine on Linux is not great.

tiborsaas|8 days ago

Probably because they don't trust the OS shipped browser engine for small inconsistencies.

koolala|8 days ago

A webview gives way less control.