top | item 47107124

(no title)

einrealist | 8 days ago

If the output has problems, do you usually rerun the compilation with the same input (that you control)? I don't usually.

What is included in the 'verify' step? Does it involve changing the generated code? If not, how do you ensure things like code quality, architectural constraints, efficiency and consistency? It's difficult, if not (economically) impossible, to write tests for these things. What if the LLM does not follow the guidelines outlined in your prompt? This is still happening. If this is not included, I would call it 'brute forcing'. How much do you pay for tokens?

discuss

order

bandrami|8 days ago

I thought to myself that I do this pretty frequently, but then I realized only if I'm going from make -j8 to make -j1. I guess parallelism does throw some indeterminancy into this

eichin|8 days ago

If parallelism adds indeterminacy, then you have a bug (probably in working out the dependency graph.) Not an unusual one - lots of open source in the 1990s had warnings about not building above -j1 because multi-core systems weren't that common and people weren't actually trying it themselves...

fragmede|8 days ago

The time I was able to make -j 128 and it took 3 minutes to do what used to take an hour, I almost wet myself.