(no title)
guiambros | 7 days ago
But I get the impression from your comment that you have a fixed idea, and you're not really interested in understanding how or why it works.
If you think like a hammer, everything will look like a nail.
guiambros | 7 days ago
But I get the impression from your comment that you have a fixed idea, and you're not really interested in understanding how or why it works.
If you think like a hammer, everything will look like a nail.
scuff3d|7 days ago
The system is inherently non-deterministic. Just because you can guide it a bit, doesn't mean you can predict outcomes.
guiambros|7 days ago
The system isn't randomly non-deterministic; it is statistically probabilistic.
The next-token prediction and the attention mechanism is actually a rigorous deterministic mathematical process. The variation in output comes from how we sample from that curve, and the temperature used to calibrate the model. Because the underlying probabilities are mathematically calculated, the system's behavior remains highly predictable within statistical bounds.
Yes, it's a departure from the fully deterministic systems we're used to. But that's not different than the many real world systems: weather, biology, robotics, quantum mechanics. Even the computer you're reading this right now is full of probabilistic processes, abstracted away through sigmoid-like functions that push the extremes to 0s and 1s.
winrid|7 days ago
Is it engineering? Maybe not. But neither is knowing how to talk to junior developers so they're productive and don't feel bad. The engineering is at other levels.