Does the book have something to say? or is it just a papermill-filler?
Same question applies to software..
re: anecdote: .PDF written in python: PDF is actually (interpreted) code. Postcript's variant. Very powerful and not-very-human-friendly - you know, reversed-polish-notations and matrixes all-over. Any machine may generate it very, very easy.. as long as it knows how. But.. Nobody has ever written that by hand.. hence.. omnipotent coding-generator writes python to write postscript. is that a Bitter lesson? or irony? or both?
svilen_dobrev|7 days ago
Does the book have something to say? or is it just a papermill-filler?
Same question applies to software..
re: anecdote: .PDF written in python: PDF is actually (interpreted) code. Postcript's variant. Very powerful and not-very-human-friendly - you know, reversed-polish-notations and matrixes all-over. Any machine may generate it very, very easy.. as long as it knows how. But.. Nobody has ever written that by hand.. hence.. omnipotent coding-generator writes python to write postscript. is that a Bitter lesson? or irony? or both?