[ncr100]

Post human thinking by the CEO is not helping me feel comfortable with the Vision setting going on for Open AI.

Edit: Or perhaps more correctly, "less valuable human". Which is more appropriate?

[thenthenthen]

Good question. It sounds like post-humanism, which, even in like left art circles was considered ‘interesting’ ten years ago (like post-antroposcene). These are not very useful terms so appreciate the nuance of ‘less valuable human’. It is not so catchy though, maybe we need to dig deeper. I am sure this has been discussed before.