I understand he’s making a technical point about efficiency, but language isn't neutral and I think it betrays something deeper. It's such a glib and shallow point too that I think it should be called out since he has a track record of saying some incredibly shallow things about AI, people, politics, and everything really.
The meaning of a message is what is intended + communicated, assuming those intentions were communicated clearly.
Willfully interpreting otherwise (especially uncharitably so) is the very definition of being disingenuous, which is pretending to not know what was really meant.
jmfldn|7 days ago
polotics|7 days ago
dang|7 days ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
csallen|6 days ago
Willfully interpreting otherwise (especially uncharitably so) is the very definition of being disingenuous, which is pretending to not know what was really meant.