top | item 47117254

(no title)

bob001 | 7 days ago

Which is all fluff until someone links to a peer reviewed study.

discuss

order

walterbell|7 days ago

https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volum...

  Citing Program for International Student Assessment data taken from 15-year-olds across the world and other standardized tests, Horvath noted not only dipping test scores, but also a stark correlation in scores and time spent on computers in school, such that more screen time was related to worse scores.

bob001|7 days ago

Let's see what this study actually says, shall we?

> Students who spent up to one hour per day on digital devices for learning activities in school scored 14 points higher in mathematics than students who spent no time, even after accounting for students’ and schools’ socio-economic profile, and this positive relationship is observed in over half (45 countries and economies) of all systems with available data.

That sounds like school laptops to me.

qsera|7 days ago

>peer reviewed study..

So you trust the peer, but not the author? How come?

bob001|7 days ago

The peer review process provides a minimal level of verification, and the paper provides details that can be directly looked at.