[mpweiher]

You are confusing "issues" with "lack of need" and "lack of benefit of proposed solution".

Again, I think the tech is cool, and I would actually really like to both better understand and try out the tech. But to try something out in earnest, I need some concrete use-case, and so far the use-cases I have seen range from "meh" to "get it away from me".

For agentic coding, I also needed some concrete use cases, and I found where it worked really well, where it struggles, and where it's just horrible.

[enraged_camel]

Okay but like, some people don't live the types of lives where they could benefit from an assistant, either a real one or an AI one. I'm one such person. My life is pretty simple. I don't juggle a thousand different things, and am comfortable with taking care of everything myself. But I also recognize that not everyone is like that. I have a lot of friends who can barely stay on top of things. They have families, demanding jobs (sometimes more than one), lots of responsibilities, and they constantly forget to do stuff or postpone due to lack of time. I think tech like this, once (if) it becomes more reliable and user-friendly, could really gain a lot from them.

Bottom line is that there's a big difference between "not useful to me" and "not useful". If it was the latter, nobody would have human personal assistants either... but that's not the case.

[mpweiher]

I always clearly stated that the use cases don't resonate with me and that I don't see the point.

And the people who have (the need for?) human personal assistants seem like a very small subgroup to me.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯