top | item 47122251 (no title) ForHackernews | 6 days ago [flagged] discuss order hn newest ddalex|6 days ago A human is not punished, the access of the robot to the API is restricted. The human has not suffered any damage. ForHackernews|6 days ago The human paid money for access that has now been revoked. load replies (1) pja|6 days ago You’re responsible for the things your AI agent does. ForHackernews|6 days ago I'll be very surprised if our corporate masters allow that to be true, legally https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/622/ lucianbr|6 days ago If Google and OpenAI and the rest would say this as loud as they praise their models, I would never write comments like that. But this is the fine print, buried somewhere. And so we need to bring it up, because, lo and behold, it matters.
ddalex|6 days ago A human is not punished, the access of the robot to the API is restricted. The human has not suffered any damage. ForHackernews|6 days ago The human paid money for access that has now been revoked. load replies (1)
pja|6 days ago You’re responsible for the things your AI agent does. ForHackernews|6 days ago I'll be very surprised if our corporate masters allow that to be true, legally https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/622/ lucianbr|6 days ago If Google and OpenAI and the rest would say this as loud as they praise their models, I would never write comments like that. But this is the fine print, buried somewhere. And so we need to bring it up, because, lo and behold, it matters.
ForHackernews|6 days ago I'll be very surprised if our corporate masters allow that to be true, legally https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/622/
lucianbr|6 days ago If Google and OpenAI and the rest would say this as loud as they praise their models, I would never write comments like that. But this is the fine print, buried somewhere. And so we need to bring it up, because, lo and behold, it matters.
ddalex|6 days ago
ForHackernews|6 days ago
pja|6 days ago
ForHackernews|6 days ago
lucianbr|6 days ago