[iLoveOncall]

Except 40€ a month is extremely poor value for this CPU that's more than a decade old.

[dijit]

Is it? It's 10x the price on GCP:

https://cloud.google.com/products/calculator?dl=CjhDaVEyWWpJ...

The CPU is the same generation; https://docs.cloud.google.com/compute/docs/general-purpose-m...

[burnte]

No, that's actually a really good deal for dedicated hardware with those specs. For a project sized for hardware like that, the CPU is a lot less relevant than the RAM and storage and transfer.

[mkesper]

If you need more power check out the AX line of dedicated servers: https://www.hetzner.com/dedicated-rootserver/matrix-ax/

[tmtvl]

8 threads at 3.4 GHz, 8MB cache. Seems fine, depending on your use case.

[Aurornis]

Measuring CPUs by thread count and clock speed is not a good way to gauge performance. A current gen CPU would be several times faster than this old CPU.

Depending on workload, this old CPU might be as slow as a 2 thread or even 1 thread current gen server.

[c16]

For the 5 api requests a second most projects will get, it'll probably do.

[locknitpicker]

> Except 40€ a month is extremely poor value for this CPU that's more than a decade old.

This is a rather baffling opinion to have. All cloud providers charge far more for a virtualized instance running on God knows what hardware. You are faced with a deal where you can run your software on bare metal, and you complain about... About what exactly?

[ErroneousBosh]

Except you're getting a couple of disks, many GB of RAM, and some on-site 24/7 support, limitless network traffic, and your electricity bill.

Not too bad considering.