(no title)
agentultra | 6 days ago
You could, for example, make it illegal to target children with targeted advertising campaigns and addictive content. Then throw the executives who authorized such programs in jail. Punish the people causing the harm.
varenc|6 days ago
Stronger punishment creates more of an incentive to age verify. Which is basically why it's happening now.
cloverich|6 days ago
There is a difference between identifying specific children, and running programs that target children more generally; and / or having research that shows how your product harms children, and failing to do anything to stop it. We can tackle both of those issues without requiring age verification. We're headed down the path of age verification because we know now that not only is social media harmful, it's especially harmful to kids, and has been specifically targeted to them. Those are things that can be fixed, regardless of how you feel about age verification. Its not different than tobacco being not allowed to create advertisements for kids; its the same type of people doing the same types of things in the end.
barbazoo|6 days ago
NoMoreNicksLeft|6 days ago
Gee, I wonder if the executives who are suspected of doing such things haven't spent the last 100 years building the infrastructure necessary to avoid charges, let alone jail time? Large corporate legal departments, wink-wink-nudge-nudge command and control hierarchies where nothing incriminating is ever put into writing, voluminous intra-office communications that bury even the circumstantial evidence so deeply no jury could understand it even if the plaintiffs/state could uncover it, etc.
Anyone over the age of 12 that thinks corporate entities can be made to be accountable in a meaningful way is more than naive. They are cognitively defective. Or is it that you realize they can't be held accountable but you'd rather maintain the status quo than contemplate a country which abolished them and enforced that all business was the conducted by sole proprietorships and (small-n) partnerships?
agentultra|6 days ago
Sure, there's a lot of corruption right now. Doesn't have to stay that way.
cubefox|6 days ago
Perz1val|6 days ago
sunaookami|5 days ago
scotty79|6 days ago
downrightmike|5 days ago
agentultra|5 days ago
The funny thing is, just like how politicians have been led to believe that AI data centres create jobs, politicians think this system can be managed responsibly so that only they can get access to its data [0].
[0] https://cybernews.com/security/global-data-leak-exposes-bill...
davkan|5 days ago
I’ve never met a single person who believed Facebook was a force for good. Why allow it to exist in its current form at all.
If these companies are the new town square then make a real online town square run by the government people can use if they so choose and then break up the monopolies that are destroying the fabric of all the societies on the globe.
We never in a million years should have allowed these companies to establish global scale communications platforms without the ability to properly moderate them with human intervention and that’s not even to speak of the actual nefarious intent they possess to drive engagement and the anti democratic techno feudalist sickening shit we see from their CEOs like Thiel et al.
They are a plague on our species that makes sport betting apps look like childs play.