top | item 47124107 (no title) kuboble | 7 days ago There are also objective measures for more fine position evaluation.For winning/drawn positions: "What is the smallest program that can guarantee your side to win/draw" probably adding some time constraint. discuss order hn newest im3w1l|7 days ago I think program size is probably not a good measure since any heuristic you can put in could be discovered at runtime with a metaheuristic that searches for good heuristics. Time and memory make more sense. paulddraper|6 days ago Measuring the size of a model that produces a win?Theoretically valid, but that's not going to be a very useful/diable. kuboble|6 days ago No, but in practice centipawns reported by the imperfect engine are good.But I want to point out that in theory there is also something more than pure win/ lose/ draw with prefect play. jmount|7 days ago That is a neat variation.
im3w1l|7 days ago I think program size is probably not a good measure since any heuristic you can put in could be discovered at runtime with a metaheuristic that searches for good heuristics. Time and memory make more sense.
paulddraper|6 days ago Measuring the size of a model that produces a win?Theoretically valid, but that's not going to be a very useful/diable. kuboble|6 days ago No, but in practice centipawns reported by the imperfect engine are good.But I want to point out that in theory there is also something more than pure win/ lose/ draw with prefect play.
kuboble|6 days ago No, but in practice centipawns reported by the imperfect engine are good.But I want to point out that in theory there is also something more than pure win/ lose/ draw with prefect play.
im3w1l|7 days ago
paulddraper|6 days ago
Theoretically valid, but that's not going to be a very useful/diable.
kuboble|6 days ago
But I want to point out that in theory there is also something more than pure win/ lose/ draw with prefect play.
jmount|7 days ago