[ok123456]

Then why did most software fail to do that even before the advent of LLMs?

[sethops1]

Because designing systems that work well is difficult. It takes years of experience to develop the muscle memory behind quality systems architecture. Writing the code is an implementation detail (albeit a large one).

[stackghost]

Because coding bootcamps and CS programs were churning out squillions of people who could type the code but had poor design and analytical skills, because there was a time where being able to implement Dijkstra on a whiteboard would get you 400k at a FAANG.

[LtWorf]

And you think these people will now produce better results with the assistance of an LLM that was trained on their work?

[fxtentacle]

Are we sure it's not failing anymore after the advent of LLMs?