top | item 47137372

(no title)

fernandopj | 5 days ago

That is the crux of the problem we're facing as a society: many, many leaders have this idea that they are better served by an AI that is 70% (?), 80% (?) correct when helping them make decisions about their business, than trusting humans - consultants, employees, pundits - that they don't even trust their judgments, bias, own goals, much less paying them.

For those people, an AI better (much better?) than a coin toss is the goal, if it means not relying on people.

Personally, I already deal weekly with people that veemently antagonizes every line of thinking if it isn't what ChatGPT told them before a meeting.

discuss

order

ethbr1|5 days ago

The root issue is epistemological.

If one puts their faith in answers that come out of a black box, then one must justify the black box's omniscience, specifically by prioritizing it above human intellect and deprioritizing attempts to reason through its logic.

You saw it with older people blindly following sat navs because they'd forgotten how to navigate. And those were much less believable sounding devices!

It's not going to stop until/if the first execs are thrown in jail because the 'I just trusted AI' defense fails.