[kube-system]

None of those things you cited is “human vision or perception”

“Low visibility during weather events” is a small subset of this.

A ridiculously common example of the limitations of human vision is when people hit curbs parallel parking because of the inherent limitations of relying on depth perception to estimate the exact location of the vehicle when it cannot otherwise be directly seen. Go look in a parking lot and see how common curbed wheels are.

Also, NHTSA estimates that they don’t have any information for 60% of incidents, because they go unreported.

[throw10920]

> None of those things you cited is “human vision or perception”

> “Low visibility during weather events” is a small subset of this.

You're still refusing to do the most basic research or even read my comment:

> In 2023, the combined causes of alcohol, speeding, and distracted driving (all cognitive/attention issues) caused 67% of highway deaths.

Do the math. 100% - 67% is 33%. Even literally not opening Google, you can already deduce that the maximum fraction of fatalities caused by vision is 33%.

Given that you aren't interested in reading or researching and instead just want to push your opinion as fact, I think your claims can be safely discarded.

Edit: Because you're editing your comment because you realize that you're making an absolute fool of yourself:

> A ridiculously common example of the limitations of human vision is when people hit curbs parallel parking

A completely irrelevant distraction - this causes virtually zero accidents and even fewer fatalities, and you know it.

> Also, NHTSA estimates that they don’t have any information for 60% of incidents, because they go unreported.

Aha, so now you actually did research, and found that all of the available data supports my claims, so you're attempting to undermine it. Nice try. "Estimates" vs. actual numbers isn't really a contest.

Come back when you have actual data - until then, you're just continuing to undermine your own point with your ridiculous fallacies and misdirections - because if you actually had a defensible claim, you'd be able to instantly pull out supporting evidence.

[kube-system]

Dude, you're arguing with a straw man.

I'm not arguing about fatalities or relative percentages of contributing factors, nor am I arguing that alcohol/speeding/attention are not all also issues. They are, you're right.

The only thing I argued is that "lapses in human visual perception are responsible for some crashes", which is a fact.