(no title)
bri3d | 5 days ago
https://vmfunc.re/blog/persona
I definitely recommend reading this primary source before drawing conclusions about the code as most of the secondary reporting is quite low quality.
bri3d | 5 days ago
https://vmfunc.re/blog/persona
I definitely recommend reading this primary source before drawing conclusions about the code as most of the secondary reporting is quite low quality.
cloverich|5 days ago
[1]: https://withpersona.com/blog/post-incident-review-source-map...
[2]: https://x.com/Persona_IDV/status/2025048195773198385?s=20
nailer|5 days ago
dvfjsdhgfv|5 days ago
https://nitter.net/Persona_IDV/status/2025048195773198385
unknown|5 days ago
[deleted]
bondarchuk|5 days ago
@dang can this get a second chance?
nebezb|5 days ago
The differences in proclaimed data retention periods is concerning though. The rest is par for the course for KYC/AML.
bri3d|5 days ago
My takeaway was that in this case, even an author with a clear and extreme bias against this sort of thing could find only unfortunately-common bad practices rather than deeply nefarious intent. Of course, this is just the front-end code, but this just looks like a KYC platform to me. Most of the secondary reports on this write-up seem to completely ignore section 0x13 and jump to the specific conclusions the author does not draw.
The fact that we've created a system where Discord need and want a KYC platform is a different and quite strange thing, but the KYC platform itself just looks like what it says on the tin.
boppo1|5 days ago
dgxyz|5 days ago
Please make it actually readable and don't steal my audio!
BoredPositron|5 days ago
[deleted]
dunder_cat|5 days ago
beacon294|5 days ago
cloverich|5 days ago
vincnetas|5 days ago
pavel_lishin|5 days ago
fuddle|5 days ago
tofuahdude|5 days ago
unknown|5 days ago
[deleted]