(no title)
SunshineTheCat | 5 days ago
I can't imagine how unhappy individuals must be who consume nothing but legacy news outlets.
It's like they sell sadness and they have to keep finding new, over-the-top ways to promote it.
SunshineTheCat | 5 days ago
I can't imagine how unhappy individuals must be who consume nothing but legacy news outlets.
It's like they sell sadness and they have to keep finding new, over-the-top ways to promote it.
adamors|5 days ago
Probably less unhappy than those doomscrolling on Reddit/X/TikTok/BlueSky etc.
DaiPlusPlus|5 days ago
I think you mean US rolling news channels (specifically, Fox, MSNBC/MSNOW, etc)? Because there's plenty of "legacy" news I consume that certainly don't give me that impression (for example, The Economist). I suppose it matters that it's news that I'm paying for, as opposed to being free but ad-supported, and being print vs. TV - so they have different incentives and pressures.
railgunmerlin|5 days ago
lynndotpy|5 days ago
https://lite.cnn.com/2026/02/24/tech/hegseth-anthropic-ai-mi...
"Legacy news outlets" are the only ones doing this. NPR and CBC have this too. No JavaScript, no autoplaying videos. It's very nice.
sublinear|5 days ago
- Daria 1997
some_furry|5 days ago
luddit3|5 days ago
I miss the days when the lowest common denominator did not have the largest bullhorn.
SunshineTheCat|5 days ago
1.) Hockey highlights 2.) LoTR memes 3.) kittens
While the addictive nature of social media is a problem, what you're describing is only being fed to people who want to watch it (kinda like legacy media).