top | item 47144290 (no title) iberator | 5 days ago IMO Lisp is harder to implement than Forth, and LESS readable, butt MAYBE i fell into the same trap as others with Forth. hahaha discuss order hn newest unknown|5 days ago [deleted] NetMageSCW|4 days ago actually I think Lisp is easier to implement than Forth, buth is it really Forth if the internals aren’t discussed? (E.g. Word secondary, threaded code, etc) lebuffon|4 days ago Forth does not specify threaded code. Implementation is left to the implementor.Internally Forth can be direct threaded code, indirect threaded code, byte code, sub-routine calls or optimized native code.
NetMageSCW|4 days ago actually I think Lisp is easier to implement than Forth, buth is it really Forth if the internals aren’t discussed? (E.g. Word secondary, threaded code, etc) lebuffon|4 days ago Forth does not specify threaded code. Implementation is left to the implementor.Internally Forth can be direct threaded code, indirect threaded code, byte code, sub-routine calls or optimized native code.
lebuffon|4 days ago Forth does not specify threaded code. Implementation is left to the implementor.Internally Forth can be direct threaded code, indirect threaded code, byte code, sub-routine calls or optimized native code.
unknown|5 days ago
[deleted]
NetMageSCW|4 days ago
lebuffon|4 days ago
Internally Forth can be direct threaded code, indirect threaded code, byte code, sub-routine calls or optimized native code.