(no title)
lurkshark | 5 days ago
Their threat to label it a supply chain risk also feels toothless because they've basically admitted that using Claude is a benefit, so by their own logic they're be shooting themselves in the foot to ban contractors from using it.
JohnMakin|5 days ago
I am not at all a skeptic anymore on this stuff and the science is well beyond me, but from what I think I know about alignment issues, and anthropic’s intense focus on solving these, it would not surprise me at all if we learn that catering to US whims on AI safety will result in the model actually getting worse or causing intense, 2nd and 3rd order unintended consequences. I’m not saying I believe there is a Terminator sequence of events happening, but if I did believe that, the headlines right now would look exactly what that would look like.
Alignment is the biggest issue for me - in terms of getting these things to actually behave in an environment where it is absolutely necessary that they behave. If I had to guess, that’s probably why the military is preferring to use it. Claude tooling is the only thing I have used yet in this hype cycle that actually I can get to behave how I want and obeys (arguably, and often to a fault).
However I also believe we’re in the worst possible timeline so the moment we get a taste of something that works as promised, it’ll be ripped away because the govt decides to do something stupid or build a moat around its use in a way to make it less useful, and favor other more “compliant” competitors.
Either way I bet there are some wild board room discussions going on at Anthropic right now.
pksebben|4 days ago
It's almost as if contextual awareness and consideration are cornerstones of intelligence.
0 - https://www.theverge.com/news/617799/elon-musk-grok-ai-donal...