[ignoramous]

> This is about the idea that a falsity is "not up for debate".

Your assertion that there's "no comparison whatsoever" is of course not, when there's ample.

> who isn't here to try to explain himself

Lets just say that social norms & experiences drive much of what people believe in. One of Leibowitz's student goes:

  "I hated the notion of occupation since the very beginning. My first memories from after the 67 war are traveling with my children in the occupied territories. There were awnings over groceries stores with Hebrew lettering advertising Osem noodles. I couldn't bear it. I thought that was dreadful because I remembered German lettering in France. I have very strong feelings about Israel as an occupier."

We can guess what their "very strong feelings" might have been having experienced Nazi occupation of France during WW2.

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/jul/18/daniel-kahnema...

[throwaway3060]

What is ample? Can you provide any evidence that Gaza can be put in the same breath as Leningrad? Russia calls all the West "Nazis", should we just listen to them?

I think you really need to learn more about the eastern front, if you're going to keep making or supporting comparisons based on incomplete knowledge. There is no comparison between the experiences in France and the experiences in Ukraine during WW2. There is a reason why historian Timothy Snyder titled one of his books "Bloodlands".

Gaza is no Leningrad or Stalingrad.

[ignoramous]

> making or supporting comparisons based on incomplete knowledge

Comparisons needn't be limited to one event or one atrocity.

> Russia calls all the West "Nazis", should we just listen to them?

All? I doubt that. Even then, unfortunately for you, like Leibowitz, Kahneman (perhaps world's foremost & finest thinker) isn't alive either to explain himself.