[themanmaran]

I understand the pitch, and the extra value add of having some existing relationship with the hotels / etc.

But the quality of the actual AI response is just worse than GPT 5.2. Which makes it feel like a tacked on thing and more of a gpt wrapper.

I asked about a retreat with our US team that could also include one engineer in Pakistan that needs a visa. And the response was something to the effect of: "Assuming your engineer has a US visa, you can go to Puerto Rico".

Whereas chatgpt gave a much more well researched answer.

[vincentalbouy]

This is interesting thank you for reporting that. I am goi t o investigate that use case deeper. The models at core are Gemini / ChatGPT / claude so you should get a similar level answer or better (because of our data) not worse. I think in the VISA, we may have to do a specific training and setup of the system prompt.

Just so I know, you asked the exact same thing in both ChatGPT and our product? no changes?

Maybe the algorithm was too pushy on venue selection and not enough focused on the understanding of your problem.

[thirtygeo]

Similar for me. I asked for a retreat in Lima, Peru, and got one low star option in Lima and then places in Ohio, Mexico and Colombia... ChatGPT got it on first try

[vincentalbouy]

Yes you are right, we have a lack of supply there, and we do not show places that we are not able to Book. Chat GPT is showing data, we are showing bookable venue. But I agree that in Peru our supply is too limited so the experience is not ideal. Thank you for reporting, I appreciate the time spent