[margalabargala]

The article author claims AI was not used to write the article.

Personally I believe them, considering the content of the article.

[qsi]

The article as written is entirely consistent with John Cochrane's style. I have been reading him off and on over the years so I think I have a decent baseline for comparison. It doesn't smell of AI to me.

If anything, even the included quotes from Refine don't smell much of typical AI, but maybe I am less discerning there. I did notice the em-dashes though!

[throw310822]

We flew past the Turing test so brilliantly that now people have to try to convince interviewers that they're real.

[Doc-Bok]

For what it's worth, my AI content blocker blocked the article.

[alex_smart]

It’s worth nothing, to the point it makes people wonder why you even volunteer that information.

[st-keller]

Happens a lot to highly reasonable, well written texts without orthographical errors.

[qsi]

Maybe because it quotes (at length) AI-generated output?