top | item 47163779

H-Bomb: A Frank Lloyd Wright typographic mystery

134 points| mrngm | 3 days ago |inconspicuous.info

37 comments

order

zem|11 hours ago

I will admit I lost interest after it was revealed that the letters had been replaced several times and that the original was most likely correct. "frank lloyd wright messed up the orientation of an H" has a bit of interest to it; "some random later person messed it up" has none.

JohnCClarke|9 hours ago

A long and venerable litany of spaceflight disasters would beg to differ:

- Apollo "Little Joe" A-003 (May 19, 1965): A roll gyro - Proton-M Launch Failure (July 2, 2013): Yaw sensors - Genesis Space Probe (2001): Accelerometer

Getting things the right way round is very important.

gylterud|3 hours ago

Not sure why the comments here are so negative! I found it mildly interesting, and worth a few minutes on a Sunday!

II2II|4 hours ago

I don't understand why the author is intent on pinning the ever changing orientation of the letters on architects. Wright's intent would have been in the architectural drawings. Everything after that, including the original installation, would be the responsibility of the person who installed the lettering. I've seen much more obvious errors (e.g. spelling errors) occur during the installation of similar signage ... things that would not have made it to the final architectural drawings.

chris_engel|11 hours ago

Nobody speaks about the way larger spacing between "AND THE" in comparison to the other spaces...

parpfish|16 hours ago

Im curious if the mounting points for the letters had 180deg rotational symmetry. If they didn’t (such as a mount point on the crossbar in the H), that’d go a long way to explaining “correctness”.

Cerium|16 hours ago

The second image in the article clearly shows screw holes in the letters. The H appears to be perfectly symmetric for 180 degree mounting.

greggsy|16 hours ago

I was initially interested but after skimming through I questioned if this pedantic detective tale needed to be told…

Just send an email to the board of trustees / body corporate and move on.

tptacek|14 hours ago

Please don't. We'll spend $500,000 tracking down what happened.

maratc|3 hours ago

The typeface that is used there is not something typical, and it's very top-heavy in letters like P and R. The top-heavy H (called "upside-down" in the article) does not seem too odd in this context. F on the other hand is almost "normal".

vessenes|18 hours ago

For the love of all this is holy, do not read this article. If the internet has taught has anything, it's that you cannot unsee an image - I predict you will not be able to unsee upside-down H's (and even an S) post-reading. Save yourself.

JohnCClarke|9 hours ago

If you ever want to watch a movie again, do NOT work on codecs. Just saying.

NooneAtAll3|11 hours ago

if you don't know what Wilhelm scream is, DO NOT RESEARCH

readthenotes1|16 hours ago

It reminded me of PG wodehouse's characters who would study newts. The British Gentry had nothing better to do with their time

weinzierl|11 hours ago

Given that there had been wrongly installed letters continuously since at least 1956 and we have no proof that an entirely "correct" version ever existed, I'd consider the inverted H historically accurate and I hope it won't ever get fixed and especially not as an overreaction to the article.

shmeeed|10 hours ago

Given that the original drawings did show all letters in the orientation that's obviously correct for the font, I'd be hesitant to say the upside-down installations were ever historically accurate. It most certainly wasn't FLW's vision.

jsdalton|19 hours ago

I was more bothered by the extraneous word spacing on the second line, between “and” and “the.” Is it just me?

emmelaich|17 hours ago

I noticed that but I guess it's to avoid the vertical river.

knallfrosch|12 hours ago

All this because some guys installed the letters wrong?

Is this some kind of joke, or is the author really lost in some conspiracy-level detail tracking, hunting for "hidden signals"?

NooneAtAll3|11 hours ago

I think you need to touch some grass if you don't know the difference between curiosity (searching for the answer and evidence) and conspiracy (inventing answer out of nothing and ignoring the evidence)

nacozarina|12 hours ago

ppl with this sort of mania should be allowed to collect disability and stay home

NooneAtAll3|11 hours ago

1) it's called a hobby

2) it's called research and there are whole ministries dedicated to answering random questions like this one

brudgers|1 day ago

I would not be surprised if the manufactured letters and their installation was based on hand hand drawn letters.

That it is not aesthetically obvious, suggests it was drawn that way and not a mistake. Good typography is subtle and bespoke typography even more so.

mjg59|19 hours ago

The article makes clear that the orientation of the lettering has changed over time, which counts against the idea that what it is now necessarily reflects the original intent.